Smiley Bishop & Porter LLP

Securities Arbitration & Business Litigation Attorneys

(800) 697-4514
Menu
  • The Firm
    • Firm Overview
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Who We Serve
  • Practice Areas
    • Arbitration Against Stockbrokers
    • Securities
    • Auction Rate Securities Lawyers
  • Cases & Investigations
    • Winning Cases
    • Current Investigations
  • News
    • Firm News
    • SBP In The Press
  • Investor Resources
    • Articles
    • Investment Products
    • Churning Calculator
    • Books for Investors
    • Notable Quotes
    • Helpful Links
  • Blog
  • Payment
    • Pay Invoice
    • Pay Retainer
  • Contact Us

Nuveen Investments Fined $3 Million by FINRA

May 23, 2011 by jordan

FINRA announced it fined Nuveen Investments $3 million for misleading marketing materials used to push its auction-rate preferred securities. Nuveen did not directly sell the securities to its customers, but it did create marketing brochures used by the brokers who sold the ARPS to retail customers. According to the FINRA news release, “The brochures were […]

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Auction Rate Securities, FINRA, Investment Fraud Attorney, Securities Law Firm

If You Want More Fraud, Try Cutting The SEC’S Budget

May 5, 2011 by jordan

The SEC’s budget is the topic of hot debate, with SEC Chair Mary Schapiro begging Congress not to make further cuts to the agency that is charged with policing our securities laws. It is distressing to contemplate that this is even up for discussion at a time when investors are still climbing out of the […]

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Collateralized Debt Obligations, Investment Fraud Attorney, SEC, Securities Law Firm, Stock Fraud Attorney

An Overview of FINRA Arbitration

April 22, 2011 by jordan

An Overview of FINRA Arbitration

When clients open a brokerage account they usually sign a contract requiring them to resolve any disputes with the firm or their broker through arbitration rather than in court. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is normally the forum where these cases are heard. There are pros and cons to FINRA arbitration, but the basic […]

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: FINRA, FINRA Arbitration, Investment Fraud Attorney, Securities Arbitration Attorney

An Outline of the FINRA Arbitration Process For Customer-Broker Disputes

April 20, 2011 by jordan

I.          General A.        Nearly all brokerage firms require retail clients to sign an agreement to have all disputes between them decided in arbitration rather than court. B.        About 25 years ago, in Shearson/Am. Express, Inc. v. McMahon, 402 U.S. 220 (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the validity of arbitration clauses which require clients to […]

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: FINRA, FINRA Arbitration, Investment Fraud Attorney, Securities Arbitration Attorney, Securities Fraud Lawyer, Securities Law Firm, Securities Lawyers, Stock Fraud Attorney

FINRA Arbitrators Order Citigroup To Pay $54 Million for MAT/ASTA Funds Claim

April 11, 2011 by jordan

A FINRA arbitration panel has ordered Citigroup Global Markets to pay a combined $54 million in awards to clients who were sold the MAT/ASTA funds (FINRA Arbitration 09-03297). The claimants, who were former clients of Citigroup, alleged that they were the victims of securities fraud, unsuitability, and a failure to supervise arising from multiple investments […]

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Citigroup, FINRA, FINRA Arbitration, Investment Fraud Attorney, MAT/ASTA, Securities Lawyers

Reverse Convertible Notes

April 5, 2011 by jordan

Reverse convertible notes are short-term bonds peddled to investors by Wall Street firms. Throughout their term, they pay comparatively high interest rates, but whether they pay back the investor’s principal is the big question. The reason for that question is because a reverse convertible’s principal repayment is linked to the performance of a specific stock […]

Filed Under: Investment Products Tagged With: Investment Fraud Attorney, Reverse Convertible Notes, Securities Arbitration Attorney, Securities Law Firm, Securities Lawyers, Stock Fraud Attorney

Lehman Brothers Principal Protected Notes

March 29, 2011 by jordan

Anyone who was sold one of these notes learned the hard way: in broker-speak the terms “principal protected” and even “100% principal protected” does not really mean your principal is protected. After Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy on September 15, 2008, holders of the notes learned that they are just unsecured creditors of the insolvent […]

Filed Under: Current Investigations Tagged With: Investment Fraud Attorney, Lehman Brothers, Principal Protected Notes, Securities Arbitration Attorney, Securities Law Firm, Securities Lawyers, Stock Fraud Attorney

Fraudulent and Unsuitable Private Placements

March 25, 2011 by jordan

Under the federal and state securities laws, most securities must be registered with the SEC before they can be solicited or sold to the investing public. In the issuer’s registration statement and in periodic reports filed after a company goes public, the issuer of securities provides detailed financial information which reasonable investors can use to […]

Filed Under: Investment Products Tagged With: Investment Fraud Attorney, Private Placements, Securities Arbitration Attorney, Securities Fraud Lawyer, Securities Law Firm, Securities Lawyers

Private Placement Securities

March 25, 2011 by jordan

Smiley Bishop & Porter LLP is investigating the fraudulent or unsuitable sales of private placement securities to brokerage firm clients. Click here for a detailed examination of private placements. The lack of transparency in the private placement market has allowed it to become a fertile breeding ground for fraud that has generated regulatory investigations and […]

Filed Under: Current Investigations Tagged With: Investment Fraud Attorney, Private Placements, Securities Arbitration Attorney, Securities Fraud Lawyer, Securities Lawyers, Stock Fraud Attorney

Nothing to Sneeze At: US Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Investors in Matrixx Securities Fraud Case

March 23, 2011 by jordan

Unanimous decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court are rare. Even rarer are those upholding class action claims under the federal securities laws. Because of this, there is reason to be pleased with yesterday’s opinion, Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano (No. 09-1156) (Mar. 22, 2011). In the case, the Court ruled that the plaintiffs stated a […]

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Investment Fraud Attorney, SEC, Securities Law Firm, Stock Fraud Attorney

« Previous Page
Next Page »
Fill out my online form.

6075 Barfield Rd. | Suite 1150 | Atlanta, GA 30328 |(770) 829.3850 | Toll Free (800) 697.4514

Copyright© 2020, Smiley Bishop & Porter LLP. All Rights Reserved. Home | Disclaimer | Contact

Hosting by Packawhallop

SuperLawyers 2011